InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 15
Posts 1652
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/01/2009

Re: ORCA post# 126182

Tuesday, 04/13/2010 6:24:22 PM

Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:24:22 PM

Post# of 241056
The way this PR was titled, I thought we for sure see some Estimates in there somewhere. I wonder why Eric does not explain the revenue potential when it comes to big deals like this one. All we keep getting is verbal, "We are making the right moves", and "we are talking to the right people"...That's great and all, but I would expect some realistic forward looking estimates on how much revenue we could get. It's easy to do. It is ok to make realistic estimates isn't it? Many companies lie and create fake numbers but with the respect and honesty we all know Eric has shown, isn't it about time he should fell it's ok to start letting us know how much revenue we can expect to make off of these deals?

I mean, as Rocket pointed out in a previous post: "325 performances per year for this one division of Feld". When we get told things like this:"We have been told point-blank that Feld is impressed with the quality and ease of use of TrackMoist for dirt conditioning and that TrackMoist will continue to be used.", does this not raise further questions? How much will be used? How frequent will the product be used? Is this the only product they will use?/Have we impressed them enough to be their "IT" product? I mean these are all vital questions I would like to know as an investor, so I know for sure these are questions Winning Brands management would like to know. Are they not asking those questions, or do they ask those questions but just not add those details in the PR? <-----and if that's the case, why not?

Just some thoughts...