United Consortium Ltd. (UCSO)

[fatherofseven]

"Discuss" being the operative word, implying openess. Let's not reach here. All the cards I'm aware of are on the table. And with that info, shadows though they may be until realized (why they've been called "futures"), we find variance of opinion... those who are big believers (myself), those who think it's a scam (M0NEY), and those who enjoy the sport... like to stay non-commital and dance in the middle and shake everything up (yourself). Makes this a study in itself... but with integrity/consistency of words/actions as a norm... one must ask how or why one adamantly opposing a security, pronouncig it a scam, predicting its failure... would choose to remain, particularly when their language would only serve to drive it further down?! It's at least as perplexing as assuming a company would make decisions with the intent to lose money (long term)... (quite unlikely, unless they're wanting to clear it out for re-sale).

I'll stand by my speculation/position with my actions... and purchase any shares on bid anyone wants to sell. If one really believes their shares to be "worthless"... and we can assume people invest to make money, I think we'd see a whole lot of red lighting up the board. And yet....