InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/09/2003

Re: chrisbaskett post# 19864

Thursday, 12/16/2004 5:27:59 PM

Thursday, December 16, 2004 5:27:59 PM

Post# of 82595
Matt agree with Chris. Better to license the tech and let the free market pay for the use without giving anyone party the whole cow. Continued revenue from multiple sources. Continued input from multiple users to R&D about improvements or problems, that will make the product stronger and more valuable. Got to make it a "standard procedure" for investigative screening. Granted down the list after CODIS search turns up no hits, but given investigative costs, it's very economical. We shouldn't kill the goose but keep harvesting the eggs!

An opinion based on my total lack of knowledge of any internal information and what the needs of DNAP are!

Stakddek