InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 287
Posts 21275
Boards Moderated 4
Alias Born 09/16/2009

Re: mrfence post# 29609

Tuesday, 03/30/2010 10:36:16 PM

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 10:36:16 PM

Post# of 34072
I would be more apt to believe that someone has a huge chunk of shares that they got free and are trying to get any value from them at any cost before this thing goes into the penny possible sub penny range. This is more likely a source of an issue because it occurs quite often than your ridiculous claim that a computer program match trading shares has any affinity for this stock what so ever…..The type of games played with an unsolicited stock are not ones of direct manipulating prices, but in fact changing the line up to block movements with large chunks to slow progress, or AON type trades that stall the trading completely. In the end they are nothing more than representative of a person rather the MM itself.

In this case it is quite clear there are shares out there unaccounted for and we heard about them last week as it was spammed across multiple boards. A half million shares that no body knows where they came from and in the hands of a promoter and possibly this company's IR.

I can question this company’s CEO rather easily on this stock because unless you can answer why they answered that question #9 in section VIII about splits as NO for past and present you have no leg to stand on. These are glaring details that this CEO has no clue what is going on and or does and is just playing a game. So what should I believe from such a document signed by this guy?

9. Any past, pending or anticipated stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization, merger, acquisition, spin-off, or reorganization; NO

Right there in black and white, so he either does not read his documents that he signs or he just does not care? Which is it and choose carefully because neither is going to be some excuse to make him appear as having your best interest. IMO

Transparency is answering all the question throughout the guide, they not only answered some of them incorrectly but also decided to not answer a huge portion of them and of course the financials are still not there. Not sure how that can be transparent.

Finally I never discounted the SEC, I discounted those who have no clue what the reports are used for and how they are continuously misrepresented here for their content. I will however take what the Inspector General has to say about the Reg SHO Daily List as the least transparent document out of the group because of its failure to separate long unsettled trades from short trades. Like I said earlier, explain why the Bi Monthly does not show this huge amount of short trades that appear on the daily? They are from the same organization.