Tuesday, March 30, 2010 11:25:18 AM
Based on the following assumptions:
1. Testing for the HDC bio-markers on tissue samples produced a specificity of 93%.
2. Testing the HDC bio-markers in urine spiked with cells produced similar results.
3. Cells are sloughed off into the urine, especially after a DRE, as seen in the PCA3 test results.
What could go wrong to prevent the HDC test from becoming a viable product?
Is it that there are not enough cells in the urine sample?
That a test cannot be developed that is commercially viable?
That Quest and Abbott may have commercial reasons for not wanting to introduce the test?
If anyone can shed some light, please do so.
Recent HDVY News
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 09/18/2024 05:05:06 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/11/2024 07:50:25 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 06/06/2024 07:10:32 PM
FEATURED DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
FEATURED SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
FEATURED SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
VAYK Confirms Insider Buying at Open Market • VAYK • Nov 5, 2024 10:40 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. Announces Strategic Partnership Between Miranda Water Technologies and Fleming College • RAKR • Nov 4, 2024 12:03 PM