InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1
Posts 507
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/05/2008

Re: midrew post# 182027

Friday, 03/26/2010 10:48:04 PM

Friday, March 26, 2010 10:48:04 PM

Post# of 202893
Truthfully, revenues from this deal is something that can only be "assumed" at this point...I suppose it is possible that EI will agree to sell them back to Matthews for the same or less than they paid for them...If that is the case I will be the first to nominate Clint for "Worst CEO of 2010"...LOL.

The LOU, although a "binding agreement", does not contain the pricing details that we should see when a contract is produced.

Could the entire deal collapse? That seems highly unlikely because Matthew's is designing and manufacturing the product. I'm sure they have enough experience at this to estimate the costs pretty close and know precisely what they are getting into. There should be no reason for this LOU to fall apart.

The Q's "should" show new revenue from this LOU in 2010...here is to hoping that it will be significant by EOY.

JMO

Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.