InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 486
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/17/2010

Re: stocktrader2222 post# 24

Wednesday, 03/24/2010 11:57:54 PM

Wednesday, March 24, 2010 11:57:54 PM

Post# of 214
I didn't imply the $116.5M would be raised in time to pay the capex, I said 'if' they had that cash it 'could' be beneficially used for that purpose. I know the terms of the warrants and you are right about $14.25 being the level required in order to make them callable.

'So they don't have $100million in cash on the books.'And they also don't have an extra 15.5M shares outstanding. But if the 15.5M do become outstanding the company will have $100M+ in the bank. You cannot mention the one without the other, therefore I don't think it's right to fully dilute your estimations(using 25.7M o/s) without somehow accounting for the cash. The treasury method tries to account for it, but the cash method I mentioned also does(thanks Fernando for showing an alternative method to treasury). An average of the two is probably the best course of action. The March presentation has a slide for the treasury method valuations using $6 $10 and $14.25 price points.


-Adam



"What goes down must come up" Inverse Newton

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.