InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,554.71
(
0.83%
)
US TECH 100
19,806.26
(
0.84%
)
Dow Jones
39,260.65
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
87.15
(
-0.21%
)
Bitcoin
56,433.12
(
-0.96%
)
Post# of 36553
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

fatherofseven

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 18
Posts 1366
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2009

fatherofseven

Re: None

Wednesday, 03/24/2010 12:13:27 PM

Wednesday, March 24, 2010 12:13:27 PM

Post# of 36553
SOMEONE ANSWER PLEASE! Clearly the report was "discovery" in nature. The process had to cover a large area, in which "striking gold" only needed to happen in ONE location to prove hypothetically valuable... OK... so we found HIGH GRADE GOLD in TWO locations!

BIG QUESTION: Where is any language about the NEXT step... actually MINING it (etc.) to determine an amount. I can't imagine 100,000 ozs. minimum takes up a ton of space.... I think our clear problem here is one of LANGUAGE/COMMUNICATION... the company conveying these processes and meanings in terms of VALUE that we all understand....
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up