International Power Group Ltd (IPWG)

[gappa2]

TThank you for the very nice and lengthy explanation of how you see things with IPWG, that required some effort. I understand your emotions completely.I asked for your help because I am in a similar exhausted condition on this investment thinking you had more energy than I...........I asked.

I came home from fishing late and tried to find out information with the translation software on Google but I got too tired of it and seem to have ran in to a similar situation as with our financial partners (limited public info).........l didn't come up with much in my short effort.May be today............others will.

I understand about credibility and confidence. We agree that is of the most crucial matter here for IPWG. I also understand lurkermore and the confidence he feels for the CEO.Yet his arrival here and the context of his experience is fairly limited in the history of IPWG since he has only been here since late February.

Since I am the old man of the sea here, let me say IPWG has never lacked in confidence and persistence and it may be paying off NOW.
IPWG was also very confident with Woody Crouch, John Mack and a third CEO, besides Peter, which now I forget.....age an fatigue is setting in, ....sorry. IPWG also has hired other engineering firms in the past such as AECOM which was a very prestigious firm which I thought they would use on this project. That is the history context the market will use today.......

http://www.allbusiness.com/services/business-services/4347307-1.html

.The wording is different in this announcement and the context is slightly different form the past since we have never reached this funding stage as announced recently.You/ me/ We may be tired but the market is not ever tired whether we like it or not.We may invest on "belief" but the market will respond with simple facts and a hard "prove it attitude. We have to get used to it as a fact of life if we are going to be investors in stocks.

The market, IMO......... does not make the subtle and fine distinction of separating stock price from "the Company"......... as we may in our minds. .........they are one and the same to it. The fine separation between the stock price and "belief"..........here is where the frustration comes in for "us"......... as investors because we may feel one thing but the market responds and operates under different rules than we may in making decisions.So at some point we have to realize and decide are we going to operate under our rules or the market rules?

Eventually you come to the hard fact that if we want to make money in an investment we have to get up to speed on how the market thinks and responds to Press releases.In our private life we may have the luxury of running and hiding away from things we don't like because of limited capacity to handle stress..............the market is unemotional in this area and does not wait.

Personally I would have liked to have seen more information on the "timing" or progress of the funding of the project.Yes........you can explain to investors on the phone the context of European business ways................but that is a slow and not efficient method. This PR was a missed opportunity, IMO, to clarify this lingering issue of ........."when is the money coming?"

I feel that with the chill and recent dismal stock response that The "confidence department" for IPWG has to work over time to overcome this perception problem and this PR would have been the perfect and appropriate forum for this.

MY asking questions and the market asking questions should not be taken on the "personal level"..............the questioning will be harsher because of the past context of failed performance and the present chill.............so the company may have exhausted its confidence bank account with the market, IMO..............even though you (as a private investor) may not experience that same thing.

The questioning is a "prove it" paradigm and is the harsh facts of the investing environment.For a stock to be rewarded, it has to operate under the same rules all other investments do...............simply because there are many stocks. You want the price of stock appreciation.........You have to provide what the market wants, not amateur investors.

You do have to prove it.That is good and right........and when you don't, that is when all the evil accusations and speculations start to surface.That sort of thing would not happen if the Pr's contained the appropriate information to answer all the questions.The responsibility for the criticism ultimately falls solely on the company IPWG..........and comes about because of a failure to communicate properly and play by the rules of the proper game.

The market is not open as I write this...........let see how the market responds? I would like to finish by saying that belief is important and may in fact be a leading hidden indicator in investing for us investors but we should not be upset when the market asks the hard questions..........like where are the filings? that is the next question that will come up here in the markets mind today, IMO .......simply because this PR lacked the juicy details the market wants to see, to properly value this investment.So...........if the information is not in the PR?..................then the market will ask?............."where can I find this information to prove it?"....Where are the filings?

The market is not going to say......."where is John's phone number so I can ask him?"....................do you see the difference?