Sustainable Green Team Ltd. (SGTM)

[eyeamgame]

What you are forgetting is the Fr's at the time as well as other pertinent occurences and discussions.

The CDM document was filed and approved and the Copenhagen Conferance was in full bloom also poised to perhaps launch the carbon industry at the time of the stock surge.

Had Copenhagen been more positive and climategate avoided the stock could have climbed much higher.

That all came after the Sept announcements of the commencement of our carbon Projects and was directly related to the time line of the stock surge.

Very few people IMHO could have been mistaken about American Sierra Gold but if they were and that was the reason for the surge the price would have dropped back into the .000's.

If anyone was mistaken about American Sierra Gold in the past they can not possibly be any longer.

Yet the price remains much higher than before the carbon credit program was launched.

IMHO you underestimate the 8 digit income projected by PR's and later shown to be substantially higher in the CDM Document and application.

Our first CC Project will produce revenues for over 50 years and we still have two more larger ones coming.

Carbon Credits provide recurring and growing Revenues as more CC's are produced as the trees get larger.

The timber harvsting is icing on the cake and is above the 8 digit income the CC's will generate.

The Revenue potential of that prospect singlehandedly was the reason for the surge and also the same reason the stock did not plummet thereafter IMHO.

It is clear to see the carbon market remains positive but has suffered by climategate and financial constraints.

Countries are still reeeling from a Global Recession and want to stimulate their economies more than they want to invest in the enviroment.

The bail outs from the USA alone have phenominal consequence and cost as does your presidents medical reforms.

Many states do not want the additonal cost of costly enviromental policies.

The USA is not alone and virtually every country in the world has been effected by the global recession.

Although their are signs of recovery they are still tentative and countries want and need to stimulate their economies.


Copenhagen made it clear that all countries know the need to reduce carbon emissions but most countries can not afford to meet the costly initiatives needed to meet targets.

The emerging and developing nations were clearly focused on at Copenhagen.

The cap and trade industry puts the pressure back on industries that prosper from carbon emissions where as carbon taxes put that burden on taxpayers alone.

Carbon genrators should be paying for carbon credits to finance Projects that will reduce carbon emissions.

It is putting the cost where it belongs IMHO.

eye