InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
87.33
(
0.48%
)
Bitcoin
58,163.22
(
-3.32%
)
Post# of 11305
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

vg_future

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 14
Posts 2307
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

vg_future

Re: None

Monday, 03/15/2010 12:58:41 AM

Monday, March 15, 2010 12:58:41 AM

Post# of 11305
To revlis, I don't have premium membership, so, posting it here.

In response to your post regarding the one month extension :

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=47798948

My thoughts :

1. To my knowledge, IDCC already has the extensions for the patents that can be applied to the patents involved in ITC process and these will supposedly cover the limitations that NOK successfully convinced the judge with. One of the board experts might be able pull up the reference posts that covered this issue.
2. Why would NOK agree to an extension when it thinks/suspects (an I think NOK's legal team is smart enough) that IDCC might add patents that can corner them?

JMHO,
vg_future
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up