InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 75
Posts 5498
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 10/19/2006

Re: None

Sunday, 03/14/2010 11:21:00 PM

Sunday, March 14, 2010 11:21:00 PM

Post# of 259
This notation is of interest from resent court documents.

http://www.advantareorg.com/pdflib/328_13931.pdf

25. Plaintiff believes that it may be entitled to a significant portion of the nearly $54
million Anticipated Refund that the IRS will owe to the Consolidated Group if the five-year
NOL carry back election is made here. As such, the affirmative tax election by Defendant would
significantly enhance Plaintiff’s liquidity and its balance sheet, and will, in all likelihood, serve
to alleviate the FDIC’s concerns in large measure. Put another way, Plaintiff reasonably believes
that a potential termination of Plaintiff’s banking charter by prudential regulators may be delayed
- or quite possibly avoided altogether - if the Defendant elects the five-year NOL carry back and
Plaintiff receives its portion of the Anticipated Refund.

Question: Why wouldn't they want the 5 year NOL tax benefit?

$54 Million more toward equity, if pursued.


"PEACE"

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.