InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 1372
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/03/2005

Re: molson_ice1 post# 129805

Tuesday, 03/09/2010 11:40:37 AM

Tuesday, March 09, 2010 11:40:37 AM

Post# of 159753
Molson, As far as I know, the legal fund does not
yet achieve the needed $20K, which as you must agree,
for 1,100 shareholders, is not a huge amount.
So, I await the fund nearing that amount before I
get further excited about BCIT's legal prospects.

Megas' silence, I read as pretty much in tune with my own feelings that until the shareholders or a few shareholders, show willingness to get a lawyer,
there is nothing to be done through the usual
channels (ie. congress, SEC, FINRA, ) due to extent
of corruption we are dealing with. I have it on
good authority (and it is reasonable to believe) he
is busy in the real world oF business, and can afford
to put BCIT on a back burner for awhile. ONLY WE
SHAREHOLDERS CAN PUSH THINGS FASTER, VIA LEGAL
EFFORTS VIA the very good lawyer Oh Bull has located,
ie. Attaway, who is, nontheless, expensive just to
retain for an opinion. But not expensive for 1,100
shareholders.

SO WE WAIT FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS TO MAKE A MOVE.
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.