Later in the year (November ’09) a change of entity name was filed, which still listed Newton as Chairman/Director. Since the filing is 5 pages I won’t post a screen shot, but simply reference the url:
For the critical thinkers, an argument could be made that this is, in fact, a good thing….
(Hint: under what circumstances would Newton need to be removed and for what reason? Of course, this presumes certain preceding circumstances, which I’ll leave open to debate.)
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.