Nope ... I was just reiterating the fact that the statement about the mayor obviously being in favor of the lawyer selected by the previous administration is misleading. See this:
Posted by: Gmenfan Date: Thursday, February 18, 2010 1:32:21 PM In reply to: rich sears who wrote msg# 62173 Post # of 62842
Excellent explaination rich. So this statement:
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Mayor cannot do anything on his own that requires a vote of the entire Council. Including releasing the attorney hired by the previous administration. Notice he has not tried to do so? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
leads one to conclude that the new mayor doesn't neccessarily support the attorney previously hired. It means he can't do anything about getting rid of him. Very misleading statement you made here:
Quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The new Mayor obviously supports the previous Councils choice of an attorney whose specialty is environmental issues and has a reputation of going after PSNH --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.