MSG has filed documents and affidavits supporting their motion for summary judgment regarding the 2 checks that were not honored upon deposit, indicating at the same time that there is no support for SPNG's cross-claim wherein SPNG seeks a summary judgment of dismissal.
IMO, if SM can't provide some substantive support for his contentions in his signed affidavit, this party is over. The plaintiff makes a very strong case. And it's SPNG's obligation to provide some evidence that can assure the court that they have a defense or the judge will decide that a trial isn't necessary. Basically, MSG has made it very clear in their papers that SM's affidavit is not true in several respects and they state just that in their affidavits.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.