Tuesday, March 02, 2010 9:45:44 AM
Neomedia management, they can take a look at the history of
this IHub thread. All the proof of shareholder desire to vote
on this issue is recorded.
I'm still struggling to understand the legality of accepting terms & giving YA 52% voting rights, temporarily. It isn't ethical, and my guess is that it's not legal.
The court injunction idea to block this action seemed to be reasonable. Why should they get the right to implement policy that only benefits YA, but benefits YA in huge ways?
PREVENTION IS THE BEST MEDICINE. I'd rather protect our investments by taking preventative action, to be safe, and let
them operate in a more transparent manner.
Would seem to me it's intentional sabotage. Nobody gets hurt except the common shareholder. Neomedia, YA Global, Neom management, and the BODs stay on the high ground, while the common shareholder gets hit by the incoming flood.
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Launchs IQ Nano Drone for Commercial Indoor Use • HALO • Oct 10, 2024 8:09 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Targets Alibaba as the Next Retail Giant for Wholesale Expansion of Top-Selling CBD Products • CBDL • Oct 10, 2024 8:00 AM
Foremost Lithium Announces Option Agreement with Denison on 10 Uranium Projects Spanning over 330,000 Acres in the Athabasca Basin, Saskatchewan • FAT • Oct 10, 2024 5:51 AM
Element79 Gold Corp. Reports Significant Progress in Community Relations and Development Efforts in Chachas, Peru • ELEM • Oct 9, 2024 10:30 AM
Unitronix Corp Launches Share Buyback Initiative • UTRX • Oct 9, 2024 9:10 AM
BASANITE INDUSTRIES, LLC RECEIVES U.S. PATENT FOR ITS BASAFLEX™ BASALT FIBER COMPOSITE REBAR AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING • BASA • Oct 9, 2024 7:30 AM