InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 38
Posts 1131
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/04/2009

Re: None

Monday, 03/01/2010 11:46:28 PM

Monday, March 01, 2010 11:46:28 PM

Post# of 17499
Ok while the board is trying to figure out Mic's DB letter, I have another one for you...

LBHI Docket 7331 is the Examiner requesting clarification from the Court that he can talk to Government agencies WITHOUT violating the order under Seal of his report!

The authority granted from the Court in January 2009, it says the Examiner must communicate with government agencies. Yet the report that was requested to be filed "UNDER SEAL" will violate the "confidentiality agrrements" if he speaks to anyone without Court permission this was filed in February 8, 2010....

Here is the question...why does the Examiner now want the clarification as to whether or not he can speak with governemnt agencies after the report was filed under Seal.

What agency now wants to speak with the Examiner? Why is the volume picking just after the report was filed with the Court...coincidence?

I think not...just my opinion.

Enjoy the Ride!

Coach T

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.