The IFRS logic was that if the tax deduction exceeded the amount of compensation cost, then that indicates that the deduction relates not only to compensation cost but also to an equity item. Hence any excess over compensation costs goes directly to equity rather than flowing through the income statement.
It can be argued either way - personally I think the existing US approach is fairer. It's certainly less volatile.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.