InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,633.91
(
1.02%
)
US TECH 100
20,118.40
(
0.00%
)
Dow Jones
39,721.36
(
1.09%
)
Brent Oil
85.08
(
0.03%
)
Bitcoin
58,270.99
(
0.89%
)
Post# of 346917
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

loanranger

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 212
Posts 32201
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/30/2009

loanranger

Member Level

Re: dpilon post# 299228

Saturday, 02/27/2010 9:36:16 PM

Saturday, February 27, 2010 9:36:16 PM

Post# of 346917
"01/14/2010 DICON patent WITH Reckitt Benckiser, WHY?"

What you are seeing is not a patent. It is a patent application which was filed on 5/11/09, which the US Patent and Trademark Office published on 1/14/10. No patent has been issued.

The inventors assigned the patent, should one be issued, to both Dicon and Reckitt Benckiser somehow. And filed the application at a time when Dicon's relationship to SPNG was supplier/customer.

"Why did Reckitt Benckiser associated itself with us on January 14, 2010? "

They didn't.




Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up