If you read my articles in their entirety, I lay out the positives and negatives so my readers can make informed decisions based on my reading and their own DD. I even inform my readers to not take my opinion but rather do their own DD to see if they agree with me or not. I am not a financial advisor nor do I have any interest in that. I do not want it on my conscience that anyone would lose money by blindly following me if I am wrong. That seems to be grossly overlooked.
A pumper typically says only good things and many times includes outrageous rumors with no validity to it yet claims they are true. Nothing negative is typically ever talked about. They pump the stock which they already own, sell into the strength from their pumping actions (manipulation) than tell their readers how they made X amount of dollars while many of their readers didn't and blame themselves that they moved too slowly therefore giving a sense of credibility to the pumper.
I try to lay both sides on the table before I make my beliefs and actions known. I have said numerous times the financials are a mess so from Day 1, we need strong demand/revenue to combat that...which Ike has said we have that demand.
If you want to call that pumping, than anytime you say something positive about GOIG, you are calling yourself a pumper as well. If that is your definition of a pumper, than I agree and you can call me a pumper all you want.
However, the majority of investors view pumpers a bit differently. Either way, I am long and have much belief in this company until evidence suggests otherwise. Good luck out there,
Mike
AI
