I love the possibility, but don't get too excited.
Charles confirmed through email last week that the lawyers indeed do have a gag order on the PR even though he doesn't agree. Here is an excerpt from the Q&A:
Charles,
Even though you don't know when MD will release information,
1) Have critical meetings been held in the past week to discuss the current issues strangling CPRK?
2) Have you been a part of those meetings?
3) If there is information to report, are regulatory entities or our own lawyers forcing the blackout of information?
Brian:
Sorry for the delay in responding...
1. critical meetings have been held
2. I have not been part of those meetings but have made introduction of several participants
3. I have been told that the lawyers have in fact "suggested" the blackout..ALTHOUGH I DON'T NECESSARILY AGREE WITH IT.
I have always considered myself an unofficial voice of the shareholders, that said I am at polar opposites with management on the issue of making information available to ALL shareholders on a steady and timely basis...
Of late I have been asked to go on the BOD to facilitate that voice being heard. I'm not sure that the BOD will find that idea palpable, but I intend to continue to stand tall in the place of all shareholders and try to hold the BODs feet to the fire on what I consider to be the single most important issue
that we (shareholders) need to see meaningful movement towards,,,
CAM
