![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Thursday, November 25, 2004 11:18:09 AM
You said there were a couple of options; Higher pps OR more shares. (You also suggested a combination of both)
He argued, correctly, that more shares WITHOUT a corresponding increase in pps was NOT an option. As the dilutive effect of the additional shares would counteract any value they would offer.
Your last post, not only mischaracterized his argument, but supported his assertion completely, when you suggest that more shares are in fact an option as long as the PPS INCREASES.
You are arguing in a circle.
regards,
frog
ps. As usual, whenever logic is abandoned for the sake of argument, one voice comes out of the woodwork to offer support...Hi Mike.
FEATURED Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM