If this is not a lop, then why are these two statement included.
monetary reform after hitting a currency issued in circulation now 25 trillion dinars, while in 1990 was about 25 billion dinars and this in itself calls for the deletion of zeros
Why would they point out the 25 Trillion dinars as a reason needed to do this. If they were just taking the big bills out as some have claimed, that would not reduce the 25 Trillion. A 3 zero lop, a 1000 old for 1 new exchange, which is what this is, will reduce the 25 Trillion to the 25 Billion figure he talks about.
many countries replaced their currency and benefit from their experiences in this area, including Turkey, Russia, Brazil and others
Those countries all lopped, nobody made a penny off of any of them. Why o why would they use those countries as an example?
