InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,782.76
(
1.23%
)
US TECH 100
19,731.60
(
1.50%
)
Dow Jones
42,221.88
(
1.02%
)
Brent Oil
74.32
(
-1.43%
)
Bitcoin
74,491.44
(
7.47%
)
Post# of 1941
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

lxu0077

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 2
Posts 225
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/05/2009

lxu0077

Re: hebercreeper post# 1216

Tuesday, 02/09/2010 5:45:46 PM

Tuesday, February 09, 2010 5:45:46 PM

Post# of 1941
So it seems that not only the AVRNQ shareholder laid out the conflict of interest argument nicely and why the current POR should not be approved as a result, but also the UST was also siding with equity holders by asking the letter to be forwarded to the court directly...or am I reading too much into this?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up