InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 9
Posts 167
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/07/2009

Re: harveydawabbitt post# 27056

Saturday, 02/06/2010 1:52:38 AM

Saturday, February 06, 2010 1:52:38 AM

Post# of 47790
Hi Harvey,
I really don't see how Exobox, advertising its PR is piss poor. As much as we would like "big names" attached to our company, it really isn't possible unless Exobox gets the approval from it's client. I see their PR as a way of communicating to investors out there. I'd rather have a PR that is not fluff, informing me of what is going on rather than being left in the "dark" not knowing what really is happening with this investment.

Why do you assume that the company isn't confident in their current product offerings? Is it simply because they did not announce the client? To me it isn't relevant, as long as they are pumping out revenues to cover their current expenses. Exobox is in dire need of funding to not only cover it's obligations, but to push forward in coding & marketing of their entire SECURE suite product line. Recall from the last meeting that $3 million in funding would be allocated into marketing their products. I'm sure you'll see something by then.

I would also like to mention that since the October 2009 announcement of Exobox closing it's doors, Exobox pretty much lost some potential clients. Those that were interested were waiting to see if Exobox would still remain around & stay afloat to operate it's business. No company would want to dump money on a product that won't be supported or be around tomorrow. I'm sure Sam VR went through mad hurdles in convincing clients & channel partners that Exobox is on board to stay.

The real question is whether or not Exobox can get the funding it needs to stay afloat & continue foward in coding & marketing all of its proposed Technolgy offerings. IMO.. I think they will.