Sirs:
You are correct. To be clear, my motives are to point out a litany of unmet statements, promises and "immutable" launch dates. Gentlemen, you may criticize me all you like, but none of that has anything to do with the facts--which are clear to anyone who even approaches objectivity--or has the intelligence of a zygote.
Raising specters of jealousy, venom, the inability of Mashboxx to get launched in spite of the fact that we had unique SIGNED licenses from every label, or anything of the like, is nothing more than a pipe dream. Sure, I could have kept trying with Mashboxx, I'm a very resourceful guy. But there comes a time when one has to be realistic and move on. You also fail to realize that : 1) Mashboxx's inability to launch had nothing to do with management, technology, or its business model (I have been very open about that) 2) Mashboxx was not a public company.
And that is the real issue here. How can the management of a publicly traded company continue to make such statements without being seriously questioned?
