Punchout, I know the frustration you are feeling with a biased individual that is a self-proclaimed expert on everything from the detection of cancer to SEC filings to FDA regulations to the laws outside the United States.
Here is a simple way to help this individual understand in lay terms the importance of adding a new tool in the war on cancer, and it is a war in the sense that if you do not combat the disease you can lose your life.
Let's take one of the the simplest tests performed by your physician that can be quite revealing. Blood pressure. Most individuals are asymptomatic, yet they can have elevated blood pressure to the point where it becomes deadly. It can lead to a stroke, blindness, loss of function of major organs, and death. Now, when the doctor discovers the blood pressure has escalated to dangerous levels (which he may take several times and in each arm, then listen to your heart and perform a physical exam) an astute doctor will probably draw blood and do a CBC, and order an MRI of the kidneys after injection of dye.
What recaf simply does (for the 5500th time) is simply test the blood for cancer. Just like the like blood preesure test. If recaf identifies MALIGNANT cancers and eliminates false positives you would be negligent not to prescribe the test. I am certain your nonmedical biased opinion of recaf will never change because you have plenty of free time on your hands to find obscure articles that are not in peer reviewed journals. Trust me, everyone is expecting it.
