And can you (or anyone for that matter) explain why the SEC choose to suspend trading against SpongeTech? Only one (1) of fifty-five (55) companies in 2009! This fact alone, should indicate the magnitude of this companies infractions and the amount of financial damage they inflicted on investors. The SEC doesn't go around suspending stocks from trading! There was real cause to here, and we'll soon find out considering SpongeTech isn't stupid enough to submit a "Wells Submission"! Oh, I've already heard the reason was because the SEC has been "captured".