BioCurex, Inc.(fka BOCX)

[Gold Seeker]

BK stated: "Also, the idea of "looking forever" doesn't seem all that plausible to me. First, a false positive result wouldn't send the hospital into a headless chicken scramble."

Agreed, no one will go on an endless hunt for a false positive. The problem is that current methods of locating cancerous tissue is not precise and any small cancers that may be detected by RECAF are the written off as false positives. It quickly could get a bad rep. That is what happened to DR70 when it was launced in 2000.

Now, once again, all of the uses you stated for RECAF could be available today with DR70/Onko-sure or HaaH. Why are the other universal markers being ignored.

They are so "unknown" that Moro can state in the S1 that RECAF is the only universal marker out there and no one knows any better to object to the false statement. Or it could be that no one really cares.

My advice. Forget the press releases. Forget anything Moro states and do your own research on universal cancer markers and then come back and tell me what you think. It will open up a whole new world.