Doesn't that make the case that.....it is a minimum at that time...
It does....or it WOULD.
Except Risicare just posted that "OBO's are on the list, they are all together as Cede and company with any one else whits shares held in street name."
But I don't know how he would know that and I'm hoping that he reads this and tells us. I'm not clear on the original source for that list (any help here?) and I'm very unclear on the mechanics of share processing, but if the list was, as you referred to it, a "NOBO" list, then I'm not sure how it would look any different than the list that we're looking at.....and Risi contends that the list that we are looking at is not just a NOBO list.
Risi,
How can you tell that OBO's are on that list? What would differ in the appearance of the list if OBO's were NOT on the list?
TIA
Edit: Throw this into the mix, from Ohmymookies......"It's not a NOBO list. It's a transfer agent list or an internal list. A NOBO list would never list CEDE shares. A NOBO list is the true owner of shares in held in CEDE's name."
