hasher,
"It's just service of process in the Madison Square Garden suit. Moskowitz accepted it for SPNG; Mongomery for RME."
I knew that. And it's possible that the descriptive details for "both" individuals were filled out by the server, Sebrina Gaise......which might account for the identical handwriting (who knows what might account for the identical descriptions).
But none of that was the reason for my post. I just thought that it was ironic......and it's possible that I'm the only one.......that the relationship of both parties to Spongetech and RME was described as Principle. Which I thought was funny, given that the proper term would have been Principal.......and there being no sign of any principles in any of the involved parties. Maybe it's just me.
FWIW, I don't think anyone knows of a Steven Montgomery in the employ of RME as a principal.......no matter how you spell it. So, even if the server herself filled out the form, someone apparently misled her. However, given the historical performance of a certain party in the spelling department, it's seems......to me anyway.......more likely that the details were filled in by the recipient(s!). Anyway, since it's a notice requesting summary judgment with the purpose of avoiding a trial, it isn't likely that Steven Montgomery will be called to testify.
AI
