InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,537.02
(
0.51%
)
US TECH 100
19,641.60
(
0.83%
)
Dow Jones
39,308.00
(
-0.06%
)
Brent Oil
87.26
(
0.40%
)
Bitcoin
58,112.61
(
-3.41%
)
Post# of 103302
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

icarus6700

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 5
Posts 748
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/11/2006

icarus6700

Re: None

Friday, 01/15/2010 5:17:24 PM

Friday, January 15, 2010 5:17:24 PM

Post# of 103302
If missing signatures, fees and some drawings and specs is the only reason for the rejection, then doesn't Laidlaw have Berlin in the bag?

To rephrase that, if there were more substantial reasons for the rejection--like problems with fuel supply study or ecological concerns or doubts about who will "own" the Berlin facility--wouldn't they have been in today's notice?
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (3) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (3) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up