Feedback Coming In and Welcomed
In scanning, I've seen:
1) Phone, Fax or e-mail USCA.
2) E-mail Atty Glenn regarding this matter.
3) Contact Indiana OAG's office.
All great ideas. I'm leaning toward #2 right now, but wanting to keep all ideas open and flowing in for now. I do see where wolf2 has written directly to RW. I would suggest he follow up accordingly over time to secure an acknowledgement of his letter and response.
I've seen some who appear to be long try to mitigate this issue by posting way off point in saying in effect, 'nice post but short selling is legal'.
* Collusion is not legal.
* Naked Short selling for profit is not legal.
* Freezing the bid and ask in spite of buys at the ask is not legal.
* Spearheading or conspiring false allegations to governing bodies is malicious and causes financial detriment to the company and its shareholders. The intent to defraud may be both a criminal and civil wrong in this case.
To post 'short selling is legal' is stating something that is known even before taking Finance 101. Thanks for the response, but defining legal short selling is far from what I'm talking about.
The intent and effort to manipulate a stock price downward is collusion and fraud. The combined effort to smear, harm, spread fear and create a down market by printing lies, libel, deceipt along with collusion in trading practices needs to be put to a stop. And yesterday isn't soon enough. Anything involving naked short selling is even a more clear signal of wrongful intent. It's not right and too many good people lose as a result.
This 'article' only gave us a glimpse at the tip of the iceberg of the problem USCA, CMKX and we as shareholders face.
The idea wagon remains open. Throw your ideas on top, one and all. : )
Bo
