InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 66
Posts 1920
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 06/14/2001

Re: roelien post# 37112

Wednesday, 01/13/2010 2:16:52 AM

Wednesday, January 13, 2010 2:16:52 AM

Post# of 197662
LOL - better look again big guy - you missed critical information here as to how misleading that statement was (hint, keep looking past that bit about the $.0044 earnings per share)...you know, the part you chose to exclude.


The net income for 9month period ending
Sept 2009 is $202,536. The $202,536.00 for the 9month period is actually better than what was stated in the PR released by RR on 11/5 and I quote from the PR:"The Company recorded net income of approximately $187,192.17 or $.0044 earnings per share..." The EPS is therefore $0.0046.

yeah, this part:
for the quarter ended September 30, 2009

thats a 120% misrepresentation of the real reported Sept 30 earnings of $85,034.

The big picture, these boys deceived everyone with numbers that don't even add up, let alone misrepresenting the period the numbers were over.