InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1511
Posts 35248
Boards Moderated 7
Alias Born 07/12/2004

Re: Braden32601 post# 58535

Tuesday, 01/12/2010 12:50:43 AM

Tuesday, January 12, 2010 12:50:43 AM

Post# of 103340
And to prove that someone slandered the company or the CEO the CEO , JDB , would have to divulge ALL evidence that contradicts the purported slander . He would have to show incontrovertible evidence that disputes the purportedly slanderous accusations or the accusations would be deemed valid and thereto NOT slanderous .

The risk / gambit for JDB is the Court may find in favor of the Defendant through countersuit if JDB does not completely prove that the accusations were slanderous and not well founded accusations against grandiose news releases and other communications from JDB that were unverifiable at the time PRIOR to the lawsuit . And if the evidence leads to dismissal and in favor of the Defendant then a pandora's box opens up for CEO JDB by possible SEC involvement and even a punitive assessment against JDB for a frivolous suit . One cannot simply sue someone without consequence if the lawsuit purveyor loses in Court .

Small gain for JDB even on the faint hope that he could win , in contrast to enormous risks and consequences if he loses .

Is that good corporate governance when he could be taking care of other stuff , like FILINGS with Legal Opinion Letters for instance ?

This lawsuit stuff looks like a rat to me , kangaroo sized .

FILE , JDB ....FILE , FILE , FILE , and silence your critics !!!!!!!!!!

See , EASY .

To bite the worm of incite is to bite the HOOK of the antagonist . They win .