Not so fast......you set the rules/agenda....and now you are drifting... CT order first....then we move on...
You should be humbled by my brillant post reguarding the CT order. I see you went chasing another rabbit though.
ANY INFO that has to be made public.....has to be made public. What is in the CT order, has to be made public....at some point.
IF VGE has a deal signed with DP, that wouldn't have to be made public at this point. When the quaterly filings are made, this would have to be made public. The CT refers to section 10.7 specifically. Our debate was about the 12/31 order granting VSPC the right to keep info quiet(that must be made public otherwise) until 2013. VGE may very well have a deal with DP, but they wouldn't have to dislose that until....they go public.....or it was actually VSPC that signed they deal.....then in either case, when filings were due. In the case of IONFINTY....because of national security.....they could get at CT order in a heartbeat.
So you guys can dream about trillion dollar contracts all you want. You can get VIBES from IR, and read between the lines.......
WHY would VSPC/VGE keep a HUGE contract quiet........until 2013?...that would further my argument of mis-management at VSPC. You think you're long now.....wait until Nov 2, 2013.
Now then.....the next question was about the live trial/lab(?) test. We have had some here suggest that IR told them that there
would be NO live trial. The testing was SO AWESOME and the demand was so Great for GKG, that DP was worried about leaks reguarding GKG and DP wanted to keep things HUSH HUSH. In fact 2 posters both came back and insisted this was exactly what IR told them. I'm not suggesting they were not told that.....but it doesn't jive with the S-1....and just as simply as I showed you the CT order, and cleared that up......I can that as well. Only if you agree that my brillant post to come clarifying this pr blunder by VSPC becomes a stickee/boardmark. Or at least take down this misleading pr......YES misleading......a couple of posters have said VSPC owes an explanation. A simple reading of the S-1.....I will copy/paste the reference showing how misleading it is.
But you also said you wanted to discuss one thing at a time.....you challenged me.....I'm in no hurry.....I'm not going to ignore.....and I won't back down.....I'll admit if I wrong....
Are we done with the CT order?......maybe another poster wishes to reply.......then we look at the live trial....the overpayment....the conflict of interest clause......all the red flags I have........that was the challenge handed down.....I accept it.....
GLTA
