Thx for the chance to gain credibilty on this board.
Here's the 12/31 filing:
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
December 31, 2009
ORDER GRANTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT
UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
VIASPACE Green Energy, Inc.
File No. 333-159717 - CF#24258
_____________________
VIASPACE Green Energy, Inc. submitted an application under Rule 406 requesting confidential treatment for information it excluded from the Exhibits to a Form S-1 registration statement filed on June 3, 2009, as amended.
Based on representations by VIASPACE Green Energy, Inc. that this information qualifies as confidential commercial or financial information under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4), the Division of Corporation Finance has determined not to publicly disclose it. Accordingly, excluded information from the following exhibit will not be released to the public for the time period specified:
Exhibit 10.7 through November 2, 2013
For the Commission, by the Division of Corporation Finance, pursuant to delegated authority:
Kathleen Krebs
Special Counsel
Notice what will NOT be released......Exhibit 10.7
Here's the 8/12 filing....
EX-10.7 2 viaspace_s1a1-ex1007.htm AGREEMENT BETWEEN IPA CHINA AND CHINA GATE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD.
Exhibit 10.7
Agreement
CHINA GATE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD (hereinafter, known as "Party A") and Guangzhou IPA (hereinafter, known as "Party B") hereby establish this agreement to jointly explore the market of Giant King Grass, Elephant Grass and Purple King Grass. In Guangdong Province, Party A shall not provide more than 20,000 units of above grass seedlings to any other clients. Party A will pass large clients (who may need more than 20,000 units of above grass seedlings) to Party B. Party B will be responsible to supply the large clients, so as to ensure Party B’s interests within Guangdong Province.
Party B shall order 1,000,000 units of above seedlings. The detail (volume and price) will be determined later based on the agreement of the two parties. After this agreement is signed, Party A shall provide sufficient technical support to Party B to plant the above grasses in Party B’s land. Party B shall start to lease the land and to prepare the plantation work.
In addition, the North American market (cooperation in the U.S. and Canada) should work in the same way. Party A shall not develop this market directly; Party B shall provide technical support and seedlings according to the market planning. Any Party shall not ask the other party to compensate the expense arised therefrom.
Notes:
1. Unit Price: *** RMB/Unit of Seedling
2. 30% Elephant Grass, 70% Giant King Grass. (5,000 units of Purple King Grass seedlings will be offered as bonus).
3. 1 section = 1 unit of seedling. Fee charge for Party A’s technical staff: 280RMB/day.
4. This agreement will be effective when 50,000 RMB deposit is paid to Party A from Party B.
5. The goods will be divided into 3 to 5 deliveries. Pay on each delivery.
6. Party A’s account number: ***. Account name: ***. (This account number is regarded as Party A’s company account number).
7. The seedlings will arrive at Party B’s land by November 11, 2008.
8. Party B will pay for the delivery of seedlings.
*** This material has been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Party A
CHINA GATE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD
RM 51, 5TH FLOOR, BRITANNIA HOUSE,
JALAN CATOR, BANDAR SERI BEGAWAN
BS 8811, NEGARA BRUNEI DARUSSALAM
Party B
GUANGZHOU IPA
The *** refer to what was asked to be excluded. Now this is not a big Red Flag to me, because the SEC allowed it. Those will be posted by me a later time, per your request.
Now here are the 2 documents.....I have NOT altered one word....exclamation point....or period....
Now are you going to copy/paste where you get the idea that what's in the CT order is the live trial results? Or are you going to suggest to other posters that have the idea the CT order is some secret IONFINITY deal or DMFCC deal to copy and paste as well?
Let me know when the debate is over about the CT order, and I will copy/paste the section about the contridictions in the MOU with DP. You know, the one that's a boardmark here. Do you think it would be fair, "IF"/when I point those contridictions out, that they get posted under the boardmark? Do you think that's fair?
Good luck to ALL.....and let me know if I can help you guys with anything else. My pleasure to do so.
