I don't know how that prompts an lol.
Any person, whether their motive be payment, investment growth or entertainment, who deceives other investors should be challenged to either admit to their deceptions or support their statements. It's not lost on me that such deceptions have been going on since the beginning of time, but it appears that you may have forgotten their cost to unsuspecting investors. And it's not funny.
I suspect that people who provide bad information would be more than happy to have others who point out their expensive little games ignore them, leaving them free to peddle their misleading nonsense. I won't do it and my inclination to respond is in direct proportion to their apparent level of influence.
I repeat the question here in the hope that it will generate an appropriate response:
If the author, or anyone else for that matter, can provide an iota of factual support for ANY of the following I appeal to you to do so. I take note that TEX cannot.
"a resolution has been successfully negotiated. The arrival of the Wells notice part of the settlement. Signifying actual implementation."
"No enforcement action to be taken against the company itself. Meaning that the numbers are sound. No need for any material restatement(s) as talked about."
"Minimum Bid price requirement waiver secured."
