Tuesday, January 05, 2010 5:18:07 PM
I just want to be clear here, these are just the negative possibilities that need to be considered. it could be all good, just not sure why all the other stuff like RSNA and no images were not so good. Also Dean saying it was basically a label, misled a lot of people and that makes me wonder "AM I ONE TOO?". Lets me just ask, would you of thought this was basically a label without Dean confirming it for ya? I sure wouldn't, and after i found out it was not labeling but part of the 510k process I was a little shaken by that. He should know this stuff, if he did he misled if he didn't what good is he in the FDA process?
Its really strange, I don't want to become emotionally vested in a stock, but a I also don't want to cheerleader it over a cliff either.
FEATURED Element79 Gold Corp Shares Further Advances With Chachas Community on Lucero Surface Rights, Provides Corporate Update • Oct 28, 2024 10:25 AM
Vocodia Enters Medical Alert Industry with Innovative Emergency Response Pendant • VHAI • Oct 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for Third Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Oct 24, 2024 11:18 AM
VAYK Asserts Goal of Q4 Operationally Profitable and Projects Major 2025 Launch • VAYK • Oct 24, 2024 10:40 AM
CBD Life Sciences Inc. (CBDL) Positioned for Significant Growth Amid Nationwide Marijuana Legalization Push • CBDL • Oct 24, 2024 7:07 AM
ZenaTech, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZENA) Software Company Acquisition • AVXL • Oct 23, 2024 8:03 AM