InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 49
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/07/2009

Re: ndkeys post# 8028

Tuesday, 01/05/2010 3:57:02 PM

Tuesday, January 05, 2010 3:57:02 PM

Post# of 59551
well the one from 2007 was FDA saying to go ahead and test it, to gather information, then come back to us.

Dean chose the equivalence process because it much faster, and he just like everyone wants it done sooner then later. if they come back and say we are in for a longer haul, which is a very good possibility. Then we go for a longer walk, while others sell to do all this over again months/years down the road.

Think about it like this, If you believe Dean when he says this is revolutionary product, nothing like it on the market then how can that jive with your idea that this is like a MRI or any other machines. Dean said it is one of kind, break through. Well that takes time if it really is that kind of product. Why? For the reason I stated before, longer FDA process