InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,477.90
(
0.16%
)
US TECH 100
19,196.00
(
-0.10%
)
Dow Jones
39,127.80
(
0.00%
)
Brent Oil
84.93
(
0.54%
)
Bitcoin
61,172.61
(
0.59%
)
Post# of 346917
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Nikodemos

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 613
Posts 36264
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/20/2009

Nikodemos

Member Level

Re: Zorax post# 272615

Monday, 12/28/2009 2:15:32 PM

Monday, December 28, 2009 2:15:32 PM

Post# of 346917
(1) Some posters suggest a stock fraud manipulation scheme.

The actions taken against EESO are more consistent with that line of inference. Similar time frames involving two separate companies (EESO & SPNG) followed by SEC actions with dramatically different consequences.

If SPNG was acting in accordance with what some posters "would have shareholders believe" then the resulting outcome/expectation ought to have been closer to the SEC (& others) sanctions as taken against EESO. Simple deduction, that's my point.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up