InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 2722
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/31/2006

Re: tommy 9 fingers post# 47280

Friday, 12/25/2009 11:22:35 AM

Friday, December 25, 2009 11:22:35 AM

Post# of 135176
Tommy9 you write some great stuff on naked shorting. I have heard and read the same that is the biggest single factor destroying small businesses and employment especially for new business ideas that could produce large employment.

For HESG which I agree is being naked shorted. Until the SEC gets serious about it there will be many startups with good ideas destroyed. It is sad to see how corrupt Nite is and they get away with it making huge money. They are the Goldman Sachs of the small markets making huge profits and the government supports them by looking the other way. For GS they loan them money and have all of their Executives in gov't to make the laws for them.

On HESG I see three ways this can play out for Tom:
1. He is lying and is diluting and is just in it for him. I doubt this one because if he was diluting this stock would be at .0001-2 by now. Also I think he would be investigated by the SEC for lying. They seem to go after the company's CEOs but not the MM's.

2. Tom is hoping the price comes up within the next couple of weeks with the release of SS. He hopes he can win against the MMs and then can proceed with his acquistion. I give this a 50/50 chance. It is hard to win against the MMs when you have ST & TDA protecting them.

3. Tom is hoping #2 above works along with him having private funding. His background from where he has worked and comes from might indicate he might have some private funding. I asked this question to Frank and I did not get a clear answer but it sounds like they have some but the question how much. I get the idea they need 100,000 for each dispensary to buy. So a couple million would go a long way. If Tom has some private funding, they will succeed and he can beat the MMs.

Merry Christmas to you and all the long HESGers