Friday, December 25, 2009 12:52:29 AM
Did these same shareholders which lost everything here have choices on the company shafting them? Could they not have been r/s and allowed to keep 15% of the total shares post creditor issued?
Last I saw in the bk filing was there were $71 billion assets and only $64.9 billion liabilities. I'd look at this like there was $6.9 billion left in equity per per Bloomberg regarding the pre-arranged filing. How is a company with positive equity able to cancel all equity and give the same equity which common shareholders owned to bondholders? How is this legal without them selling $6.9 billion worth of assets to pay toward equity holders?
NanoViricides Reports that the Phase I NV-387 Clinical Trial is Completed Successfully and Data Lock is Expected Soon • NNVC • May 2, 2024 10:07 AM
ILUS Files Form 10-K and Provides Shareholder Update • ILUS • May 2, 2024 8:52 AM
Avant Technologies Names New CEO Following Acquisition of Healthcare Technology and Data Integration Firm • AVAI • May 2, 2024 8:00 AM
Bantec Engaged in a Letter of Intent to Acquire a Small New Jersey Based Manufacturing Company • BANT • May 1, 2024 10:00 AM
Cannabix Technologies to Deliver Breath Logix Alcohol Screening Device to Australia • BLO • Apr 30, 2024 8:53 AM
Hydromer, Inc. Reports Preliminary Unaudited Financial Results for First Quarter 2024 • HYDI • Apr 29, 2024 9:10 AM