Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:03:47 PM
Thanks for the implied compliment, although I submit that it was not my questions that drove DNAP's '(w)ing(m)an' off the board. He has never shied away from trying to defend the company against any issue I ever brought up. He seems to have left in order to avoid other topics that popped up recently.
If I had any part in the imagined demise of the board [your characterization, not mine] it was in posing questions that made people uncomfortable, to which there were no 'good' answers.
And if your characterization turns out to be correct and the board has in fact died, then an obviously noble experiment has failed. It will turn out to be critical reasoning and polite questions that did it in, as opposed to all of those personal attacking 'bashers' that the TOS rules kept off the board. Who'd a thunk it?
regards,
frog
FEATURED Southern Silver Files NI43-101 Technical Report for its Updated Preliminary Economic Assessment for the Cerro Las Minitas Project • Jul 25, 2024 8:00 AM
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM