InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,716.77
(
0.25%
)
US TECH 100
19,311.00
(
0.07%
)
Dow Jones
42,111.59
(
0.11%
)
Brent Oil
73.41
(
-0.65%
)
Bitcoin
63,451.73
(
-0.27%
)
Post# of 495952
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

wstera2

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 4
Posts 820
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/06/2001

wstera2

Member Level

Re: tinner post# 78080

Friday, 10/29/2004 10:51:48 PM

Friday, October 29, 2004 10:51:48 PM

Post# of 495952
All I do is attack. LOL! Apparently reading comprehension
isn't your strong suit.

"Did S. H. attack us on 911?"

What does that have to do with the reason SH was removed?

Why don't you explain to me how this was unenforceable (see
link below)? If you can't make the entire document 100%
unenforceable, removing SH was legal & justifiable.

http://www.dalebroux.com/assemblage/2002-11-15UNResolution687.asp

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up