InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
Subscribe Login/Register
S&P 500
5,460.48
(
-0.41%
)
US TECH 100
19,181.60
(
-0.43%
)
Dow Jones
39,118.86
(
-0.12%
)
Brent Oil
84.85
(
0.00%
)
Bitcoin
61,555.92
(
1.09%
)
Post# of 704019
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

punkle

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 7
Posts 1111
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/21/2002

punkle

Re: Zeev Hed post# 316438

Friday, 10/29/2004 1:58:05 PM

Friday, October 29, 2004 1:58:05 PM

Post# of 704019

Those were not simple explosive, these were superexplosive used in nuclear devices to cause subcritical masses to go critical. You blow 380 tons of these and you have a small earthquake....

Thanks Zeev. Is a "small earthquake" something that the country could absorb or are you saying under no circumstances is blowing that 380 tons feasible? I am not challenging your statement and have no intelligence in this area. I'm just trying to understand if you think it was still possible and should or shouldn't have been done anyway?

Thanks.
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up