InvestorsHub Logo
Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
5,522.30
(
1.58%
)
US TECH 100
18,924.00
(
3.40%
)
Dow Jones
40,842.79
(
0.24%
)
Brent Oil
81.34
(
3.53%
)
Bitcoin
64,665.96
(
-2.26%
)
Post# of 118239
Next 10
Reply Private New
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next

funmaxus

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 23
Posts 1815
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/27/2008

funmaxus

Re: None

Saturday, 12/05/2009 2:29:45 PM

Saturday, December 05, 2009 2:29:45 PM

Post# of 118239
Not really sure why Case UDRS902827
- MICHAEL G. RADEMAKER -V- RCC HOLDINGS
keeps getting brought back up. Afterall, I previously posted the outcome, which was "SATISFIED" on October 16, 2009.

http://170.164.31.10/openaccess/CIVIL/CivilDetails.asp?courtcode=X&casenumber=RS902827&casetype=UD&dsn=

10/16/2009 WRIT OF POSSESSION RETURNED FROM SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY WRIT RETURNED SATISFIED WITH ADDED COSTS OF
$ 125.00.

At the present time, there are no additional line entries, and no scheduled entries regarding this matter on the court docket.

Presently, I'm "SATISFIED" knowing my shares require no maintenance and I'm looking forward to additional news.

fun

Not compensated in any manner for research and/or posts. Information should be construed as information only for discussion purposes. Always conduct your own dd. Just my opinion

Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (2) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (2) Next 10 Prev Next
Join InvestorsHub

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.

Sign Up