2late:
This position on how the judge should view the case makes sense. However, in my experience with judges, understand they rule on precedence. To my knowledge, no judge has accepted the NSS argument as precedence. I understand that Megas has evidence, especially after the law suit of "fake" shareholders. However, those that have communicated this can be viewed as insiders with privy information, similar to Martha Stewart where the difference is trading cannot happen based on the "insider" knowledge. Maybe that is why Art2Gecko seems to have disappeared.
This case will remain unresolved for unknown years to come. Remember Megas words, "time is BCIT friend". Waiting is the only game in town. Except, I did email ETrade several times telling them I was a "VERY" dissatisfied client. I kept emailing them even though they requested I email another department. I finally sent an email telling them if they are so concerned about customer satisfaction they should be calling me. They finally called, expressing concern about me using the secured email as a forum to post my complaint. They said there is nothing they can do. I asked if it is their obligation to protect the investor. The person stated yes. After several minutes of discussion, I was asked what I thought Etrade should do. I stated since it is agreed that ETrade is supposed to be protecting the investor, that I was amazed that no stock broker would assist the small investor with this type of situation against the SEC/DTCC and ETrade/brokers should partner and demand protection and proper oversight from the SEC/DTCC. It was stated they have not received many complaints like mine, especially against BCIT(is that because they put up such a defensive wall on these types of requests, the customer gets so frustrated and gives up).
Anyway it has once again been recorded and emailed my frustration with ETrade on their non-support of the customer they are supposed to be protecting.
Time and the Creator of it are my friends
AI
