I got an e-mail back from John Bordynuik in reply to my question about the status of the new machine. I asked what was the status and how was it being handled.
Hello XXXX,
It's important to understand that we are not reinventing the wheel. The
big processor works. Period. By adding the catalyst to the system we
have changed the dynamics of the processor significantly. Without a
proper effective catalyst any plastic 2 oil system is inefficient,
useless, and garbage. They have appeared over and over for the past 20
years looking for capital, then disappear. This is a viable process that
is already a done deal. The fuel derived from the catalyst is already
ASTM certified so we are not going through a "does it work?" test. We
are going through a "I want this to run everywhere" testing and
documentation.
Our large processor is in third party validation and testing. so I am
referring of all the possible documentation, analytics and safety
information required to run these processors in volume in multiple
states and countries with the least permit delays possible. The more
data the better.
We retained a state-certified chemical analysis company that is
providing engineering analytics and results for chemical, mechanical and
environmental data. They are doing extensive analysis,material balances
with all the variables present in many plastics, feedstock and output
analysis, safety systems and permitting. This data and documentation
will allow us to deploy these processors quickly.
It's important we do this right. I am constantly faced with the
decision to make it run for a month, week, day, 10T, 100 barrels, 1000
barrels (what is the magic number?) continuous and then report and
produce run ticket to prove it's the real thing, then go through the
proper documentation process, tear down, rebuild, then roll out . It
would delay us as I don't have a second one while the first is torn
apart for all the analysis and poss. changes required to maximize
deployment.
Regards,
John Bordynuik
CEO
JBI
